Capitalism and Alienation: The Foundation

The development of capitalism can be fit with the frugal development in the West. Capitalism allowed innovation to take antecedence over traditional forms of elbow grease and business. It replaced these traditional forms because capitalism was by nature a flexible and adaptive economic system. By incorporating challenger in its rubric (a sign of flexibility), it was able to encourage the private sector to confide more in the grocery, resulting inevitably to increased public welfare. It was also this competition that allowed innovation to develop.By increasing the number and quality of players in the market, economic collusion was prevented, and hence this forced all firms to formulate efficient heart and soul to capture a real portion of the market share. Because other firms would exigency to get the same portion of the pie, their relative share in the market remained the same increasing the benefits accrued to the ordination. Thus, we come to the second quality of capit alism adaptability. Adaptability refers to the capacity of a system to capture new locations to which it may be situated. Being adaptive does not necessarily mean that capitalism lead succumb to the power of tradition or existing cultural systems. quite a capitalism sought to redefine the foundations of hostelry (Marx, 1844/1959).Changing some aspects of society would inevitably result to a categorical redefinition of societal institutions. Capitalism could accordingly infiltrate the society and spread its scorching arms. At this point Marx began to picture the evils resulting from this economic system. He argued that although capitalism initially stimulated innovation, in the long run the bad effects of capitalism would be revealed in the so-called superstructures (refer to the institutions of the society as differentiated from substructures which refer to the overarching systems of any society). When capitalism developed into a full, working economic system, it encouraged t he private sector to invest in the market.The market here referred to the manufacturing and industrial sectors of 19th century European cities. This caused widespread migration of laborers from rural areas to booming industrial centers. In exchange for wages, the laborers sold their labor to capital- receiveers labor became a commodity. Because labor was treated as a commodity, the capital-owner became essentially the owner of labor (Marx, 1844/1959). Although it was far from slavery, its effects were never far from the qualities of slavery. here Marx identified two major effects of capitalism that approached the characteristics of slavery. The first paradox that workers encountered in the workplace was madness.Alienation refers general to the sectionalisation of natural interconnectedness of entities (Marx, 1844/1959). Applied to the social sciences, this refers to the natural interconnectedness of man to other things. When a man produced a certain good, it was natural to co nsider the man as the owner of such good. In capitalism, because the laborer sold his labor to the capital-owner, the latter(prenominal) became the owner of the laborers labor. Thus, laborers experienced 4 types of aberration in the workplace. Here are as follows 1) alienation of man to his own products, 2) alienation of man to his fellow workers, 3) alienation of man to the production process/activities, and 4) alienation of man to his own development.The first alienation refers to the inability of the worker to own the products made by his own labor. The second type of alienation refers to the breakdown of mans relationship to his fellow laborers in the workplace. The third connotes the inability of man to control the production process to which his labor is a significant factor of production. The last type of alienation in the workplace refers to the folly of man, given current circumstances, to develop his personal being.According to Marx, even lawyers and prize professional s end up as laborers because of their incapacity to oppose capitalism. When alienation became indwelling in the workplace, the capitalist could easily grapple the value of the laborers, exploiting it until valueless then the second problem exploitation.ReferenceMarx, Karl. (1844/1959). Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. Moscow betterment Publishers.