Did September 11 Kill Democracy? :: September 11 Terrorism Essays

Did September 11 Kill Democracy? The September 11 terrorist attack on America has provoked a strong response. Americans atomic number 18 at war. On television, from the mouths of politicians, in newspapers, this response is portrayed as unequivocal. As with Pearl Harbor, war has been decl bed on America. We have no prize just to respond with unpresidented soldiery force. Other considerations might give us a pause, if they were non being quietly swept under the rug by those eagerly pressing for war. Isnt war and violence precisely what terrorists are after? Rather than pitting ourselves against the Arab-Muslim world and lumping every Muslim in with the terrorists, shouldnt we draw closer to those elements in the Arab world that reject terrorism? roughly importantly, shouldnt we attempt to fully understand why America was targeted? Do Americans genuinely appreciate the role of the United States in the Middle East? argon our politicians and news media attempting to increase our understanding of events in the Middle East onwards we plunge headlong into war? None of these questions are being addressed. This is why the past few days have been so terrifying. A disaster can happen to any nation, but a democracy requires profound debate and exposure to the necessary information before a elective decision can be made. To quote Representative Lee of California, Weve got to impart these perpetrators to nicety. But Im saying that I have not yet seen the evidence. And until then, in Congress, we must show restraint. Representative Lee was the only Representative who voted against authorizing military force on Friday. This fact alone is shocking and should be worrisome. Where is the republican debate when, a scant 4 days after the events, in whole of Congress decides for the nation that there is no alternative to military challenge? Without full knowledge of who was involved in the events, and careful consideration of all possible alternatives, what are they basing their decision on? The messages from network television has been as well as alarming in its uniformity. Already on Tuesday, newscasters were not presenting democratic alternatives, but speculating about military targets. Is that the best that we can do as a nation, reach for our guns, striking out in anger rather than justice? If CNN starts an article with The questions are only when and where, isnt CNN is deliberately encouraging its audience not to ask other questions?