How black and white scholars have interpreted the 200th Anniversary of Essay

How black and white scholars have interpreted the 200th Anniversary of the via media of 1850 - Essay ExampleThe northeasterly expressed its resistance to the law and its resistance against the law gave power to the South. The North was against the law because it was becoming revolutionized by education and urbanization that was facilitated by industrialization. Such resistance sparked the Civil war that led to the end of bondage1.The Compromise of 1850 experienced heated debates over the course of action against runaway slaves and the leadership of the free states and the states under slavery. Senator Calhoun proposed the election of two presidents one for the enslaved states and the early(a) for the free states. Senator Clay and Webster were against the extension of slavery. The flitting Slave Law sparked many ideas about the future of the states. The 1850s was characterized by tensional reactions to the state of slavery. The Southerners wanted conjunction of all territories as a common property of all states. The Northerners wanted industrialization and development which was the primer coat for their support for the election of President Lincoln. The debates continued until the Civil War which was followed by President Abraham Lincoln who brought the reunion of the states3.The Compromise of 1850 allowed the entry of California being a free state into the union while the other two territories of New Mexico and Utah had the option of choosing their slavery status. Thereafter the Kansas- Nebraska Act reignited the controversies surrounding slavery. In a bid to gain support of the South, a Democrat senator, Stephen Douglas revoked restriction on slavery that was agree upon in the Missouri Compromise. The Northerners reacted arguing that slave power was taking advantage of free labor to control all the territories. The arguments led to the splitting and collapsing of many parties including the Whig Party. The Dread Scott ruling of the 1857 further weake ned fight against slavery by indicating that the Congress